Intake is your business. Software is your bottleneck.
Offshore builds forms. They don't build qualification logic, conflict checks, or the handoff your intake team actually runs.
Intake, routing, and practice management glue
For firms where speed-to-intake is revenue.
From messy ask to production in days
No six-week discovery phase. No ticket queue. One continuous loop — spec, build, eval, ship — with senior people accountable at every step.
Your ask
A Slack message, a 30-minute call, a messy paragraph — however you actually communicate today.
Product spec
Our product lead returns scope, success metrics, and what we're not doing — same day.
Senior review
A named engineer signs off on approach, risks, and architecture before a line ships.
Build & eval
Agentic workers build at speed; seniors review every merge. Shadow eval on your data.
Production
Staging in days, pilot in weeks. Handoff docs, observability, 30-day fix window.
It takes all three.
A model supplies none of what makes great software. You bring the product expertise — what to build and how you'll know it's right. We bring the AI and engineering expertise, plus the agentic system that turns it into reviewed, production-grade code. Drop any one of the three and you get plausible code that doesn't fit, doesn't scale, or never ships.
Product expertise
Your product expert
One person on your side owns what to build and how you'll know it's right — the requirements up front and the acceptance testing at the end. Nobody knows your business like you do.
AI + engineering expertise
An AI-native senior engineer
One of our top engineers — fluent in both the model and the architecture — owns the quality bar, reviews everything the agents produce, and rejects what only looks right.
The system we built
Our agentic worker system
A purpose-built harness puts a configurable fleet of agent workers to work under that engineer's direction, doing the physical build at speed. Dial it up or down to match your pace.
- Coding
- Specs
- Documentation
- Testing
- Deployment
= a great product
Software that does exactly what it's supposed to do — and scales to the daily active users you need it to.
Offshore vs agency vs Tylt
Offshore is cheap until you count your time. US agencies are quality until you see the invoice. Tylt is the third option — onshore accountability at offshore economics.
- Senior engineers accountable by name
- Product people write the specs
- Ship small features in days
- Prove it on your data before full price
- US hours, daily async updates
- Total cost competitive with offshore
- You own all code & IP
- No minimum headcount or lock-in
- Senior engineers accountable by name
- Product people write the specs
- Ship small features in days
- Prove it on your data before full price
- US hours, daily async updates
- Total cost competitive with offshore
- You own all code & IP
- No minimum headcount or lock-in
- Senior engineers accountable by name
- Product people write the specs
- Ship small features in days
- Prove it on your data before full price
- US hours, daily async updates
- Total cost competitive with offshore
- You own all code & IP
- No minimum headcount or lock-in
Start with intake or Clio sync
The workflow where missed leads hurt most.
Run the numbers
Legal: engineering vs intake coordinator headcount
Compare Tylt to the coordinators and offshore bench you're funding.
Your current team
Tick “Uses AI” for anyone already on Claude Code, Copilot, etc.Assumptions
Base salary → true cost (benefits, tax, equipment, overhead). Industry standard ≈ 1.3×.
How much agent time it takes us to deliver one developer-month of reviewed output. Higher = more conservative.
Cost reduction vs your in-house team
Your team, loaded
$52,000/mo
With Tylt
$13,690/mo
You save / year
$459,720
$38,310/mo · ~1.4 effective dev-months matched
Legal software development FAQ
Intake, confidentiality, and Clio integrations.
Send your intake workflow and 50 historical records
Shadow eval, spec, fixed pilot price — five business days.
Typical reply within a few hours · Pilot spots via the bar above