We forward-deploy into the role — and never leave your side.
You're hiring for a seat. Instead of a salaried human, a fractional AI expert embeds in that exact role, builds an autonomous employee to do the work, and stays on for ongoing support for as long as it runs.
It takes all three.
A model supplies none of what makes great software. You bring the product expertise — what to build and how you'll know it's right. We bring the AI and engineering expertise, plus the agentic system that turns it into reviewed, production-grade code. Drop any one of the three and you get plausible code that doesn't fit, doesn't scale, or never ships.
Product expertise
Your product expert
One person on your side owns what to build and how you'll know it's right — the requirements up front and the acceptance testing at the end. Nobody knows your business like you do.
AI + engineering expertise
An AI-native senior engineer
One of our top engineers — fluent in both the model and the architecture — owns the quality bar, reviews everything the agents produce, and rejects what only looks right.
The system we built
Our agentic worker system
A purpose-built harness puts a configurable fleet of agent workers to work under that engineer's direction, doing the physical build at speed. Dial it up or down to match your pace.
- Coding
- Specs
- Documentation
- Testing
- Deployment
= a great product
Software that does exactly what it's supposed to do — and scales to the daily active users you need it to.
The demo ships in an hour. The vulnerabilities ship with it.
Base44, Bolt, and Lovable nail the demo — then leak secrets and ship vulnerabilities in production. Veracode found 45% of AI-generated code carries an OWASP-class flaw. Tylt gives you the same speed, with senior review on every line.
Prototype → production
From vibe-coded prototype to enterprise-grade software.
The gap between an idea and real software has never been smaller. Base44, Bolt, Lovable, or a half-finished Cursor sprint — bring us what got you to a demo, and an expert on your team turns it into a real application with good code, proper architecture, and verified security, with infrastructure sized to your budget. Without throwing away what already works.
Security, verified
We scan for the leaked keys, exposed customer data, and OWASP-class flaws these tools ship by default — then close every one and prove it with a clean report.
Proper architecture
We untangle the spaghetti into a documented, modular codebase designed to scale and be maintained — not just to survive the next demo.
Tests & CI that hold
We add the types, test coverage, and deploy pipelines the generator skipped, so every future change ships safely instead of breaking prod.
Production-grade & owned
You get an app your team — or ours — can keep building on, fully documented, with 100% of the code and IP yours to keep.
Send us the repo — we'll tell you exactly what it'll take.
Professional AI labor vs. the alternatives
Traditional onshore agencies charge human rates for work AI now handles. DIY vibe-coding tools ship fast — then leak secrets and pile up technical debt your engineers have to unwind. Tylt is the third option.
- Senior product oversight
- 60%+ cost savings
- Production-grade quality
- No AI expertise needed from you
- Your team stays focused
- Consistent, predictable velocity
- Same-day patch support
- Senior product oversight
- 60%+ cost savings
- Production-grade quality
- No AI expertise needed from you
- Your team stays focused
- Consistent, predictable velocity
- Same-day patch support
- Senior product oversight
- 60%+ cost savings
- Production-grade quality
- No AI expertise needed from you
- Your team stays focused
- Consistent, predictable velocity
- Same-day patch support
Run the numbers
What would Tylt save vs your in-house team?
List your current devs, flag who already uses AI, and tweak the assumptions. Every lever is yours to dial — the math stays visible.
Your current team
Tick “Uses AI” for anyone already on Claude Code, Copilot, etc.Assumptions
Base salary → true cost (benefits, tax, equipment, overhead). Industry standard ≈ 1.3×.
How much agent time it takes us to deliver one developer-month of reviewed output. Higher = more conservative.
Cost reduction vs your in-house team
Your team, loaded
$52,000/mo
With Tylt
$13,690/mo
You save / year
$459,720
$38,310/mo · ~1.4 effective dev-months matched
Questions, answered
Still curious? Book a call — we'll walk you through everything.
Ready to ship faster for less?
Book a free scoping call. We'll map out your project, give you a fixed price, and tell you exactly when it ships.
Typical reply within a few hours