Offshore got you to MVP. It's not getting you to PMF.
Cheap hours stop mattering when you're the product manager, QA, and investor update writer.
From MVP to the features investors expect
Billing, auth, admin, integrations — without hiring six engineers.
From messy ask to production in days
No six-week discovery phase. No ticket queue. One continuous loop — spec, build, eval, ship — with senior people accountable at every step.
Your ask
A Slack message, a 30-minute call, a messy paragraph — however you actually communicate today.
Product spec
Our product lead returns scope, success metrics, and what we're not doing — same day.
Senior review
A named engineer signs off on approach, risks, and architecture before a line ships.
Build & eval
Agentic workers build at speed; seniors review every merge. Shadow eval on your data.
Production
Staging in days, pilot in weeks. Handoff docs, observability, 30-day fix window.
It takes all three.
A model supplies none of what makes great software. You bring the product expertise — what to build and how you'll know it's right. We bring the AI and engineering expertise, plus the agentic system that turns it into reviewed, production-grade code. Drop any one of the three and you get plausible code that doesn't fit, doesn't scale, or never ships.
Product expertise
Your product expert
One person on your side owns what to build and how you'll know it's right — the requirements up front and the acceptance testing at the end. Nobody knows your business like you do.
AI + engineering expertise
An AI-native senior engineer
One of our top engineers — fluent in both the model and the architecture — owns the quality bar, reviews everything the agents produce, and rejects what only looks right.
The system we built
Our agentic worker system
A purpose-built harness puts a configurable fleet of agent workers to work under that engineer's direction, doing the physical build at speed. Dial it up or down to match your pace.
- Coding
- Specs
- Documentation
- Testing
- Deployment
= a great product
Software that does exactly what it's supposed to do — and scales to the daily active users you need it to.
Agency vs DIY vs Tylt
Traditional agencies charge human rates for work AI now handles. DIY tools ship fast — then leak secrets and pile up debt. Tylt is the third option.
- Senior product oversight
- 60%+ cost savings vs agency
- Production-grade quality
- Ship in days, not quarters
- You own all code & IP
- Same-day patch support
- No AI expertise needed from you
- Senior product oversight
- 60%+ cost savings vs agency
- Production-grade quality
- Ship in days, not quarters
- You own all code & IP
- Same-day patch support
- No AI expertise needed from you
- Senior product oversight
- 60%+ cost savings vs agency
- Production-grade quality
- Ship in days, not quarters
- You own all code & IP
- Same-day patch support
- No AI expertise needed from you
MVP sprint or PMF feature push
Greenfield or take over the offshore repo — we meet you where you are.
Run the numbers
Startup: Tylt vs agency SOW vs offshore fully loaded
Include your hours as accidental product manager.
Your current team
Tick “Uses AI” for anyone already on Claude Code, Copilot, etc.Assumptions
Base salary → true cost (benefits, tax, equipment, overhead). Industry standard ≈ 1.3×.
How much agent time it takes us to deliver one developer-month of reviewed output. Higher = more conservative.
Cost reduction vs your in-house team
Your team, loaded
$52,000/mo
With Tylt
$13,690/mo
You save / year
$459,720
$38,310/mo · ~1.4 effective dev-months matched
Startup engineering team FAQ
MVP, PMF, investors, and taking over offshore code.
Tell us what you're building — get a fixed price and ship date
Full product org without a recruiting cycle. Typical reply in hours.
Typical reply within a few hours · Pilot spots via the bar above